Abstract
The study explored the efficacy of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) Validity Scales in profiling chronic pain patients with external financial incentives like workers' compensation claims. Two distinct clusters of patients were identified through cluster analysis, each displaying different MMPI-2-RF profiles. Cluster 1 had valid responding with certain elevations on somatic and low positive emotion scales, whereas Cluster 2 consisted of patients overreporting on the Validity Scales with elevations on 7 out of the 9 Restructured Clinical scales. Patients in Cluster 2 reported higher pain and disability, showed fewer spine-related imaging findings, and were more likely to be tagged as probable or definite malingerers. These findings underline the MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales' usefulness in distinguishing between credible and noncredible responses in chronic pain patients within a medico-legal context.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 634-644 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Psychological Assessment |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2018 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Keywords
- Cluster analysis
- MMPI-2-RF
- Psychological overlay
- Spine pain
- Symptom overreporting